Madrid Spanish Institute

Madrid Spanish Institute  /  Blog  /  Pen names

Literature & culture · Literary history

Signing with another name in order to publish.

Several twentieth-century Spanish women writers used pen names to overcome prejudice, enter the literary system or protect themselves from political repression.

Editorial responsibility
Madrid Spanish Institute
Academic review
Isabel B.
Reading time
6 minutes

Pen names appear in very different careers among twentieth-century Spanish women writers. They did not serve a single purpose: they could counter commercial prejudice, open a path into a male-dominated literary sphere or make it possible to work under political repression.

Three masks, three different jobs

A pen name is always a mask, but not all masks do the same work. There were at least three jobs here: dodging the reader’s prejudice, getting into a literary system that only admitted male voices, and surviving a regime that had erased you. What they share is how hard they are to reconstruct afterwards.

Carmen de Burgos

When the problem is that your own name does not sell

Carmen de Burgos (1867-1932) was Spain’s first professional woman journalist and its first woman war correspondent. She signed as Colombine, and published her column «Reading for women» in the Diario Universal under that name.

Colombine was not the only one. She also used Gabriel Luna, Perico el de los Palotes, Raquel, Honorine and Marianela. The reason says everything: her own name triggered prejudice. A piece signed Carmen de Burgos arrived pre-judged.

There is something else in her case, fascinating and a little sad. Alongside her feminist essays (Divorce in Spain, The modern woman and her rights) she published titles promising the secrets of the dressing table and the art of being loved, advertised with the promise of eternal youth. A contradiction? More like economics. Those books sold. The feminist essays, predictably, did not.

Sepia photographic portrait of the writer and journalist Carmen de Burgos, half-length, looking at the camera
Carmen de Burgos, who signed as Colombine. Photographer unknown, early twentieth century. Source: Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

Lucía Sánchez Saornil

When the problem is gender, and the solution is to masculinise your own name

Lucía Sánchez Saornil (1895-1970) was the only woman to publish in the ultraísta magazines. From the start she attached her authorial identity to the pen name Luciano de San Saor.

Look closely at the operation: she does not invent an unrelated name, she masculinises her own. Lucía becomes Luciano; Sánchez Saornil becomes San Saor. It is her name, put through a filter that makes it publishable. Sometimes she used the real one, sometimes both at once, and that wavering says a good deal about how uncomfortable the situation was.

Black and white photographic portrait of Lucía Sánchez Saornil, smiling and looking upwards
Lucía Sánchez Saornil in 1936. CNT historical archive. Source: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.

The intellectual climate

What could be written in 1923 without causing a scandal

In 1923 Ortega y Gasset (the most prestigious Spanish philosopher of the century) wrote quite calmly that lyric poetry requires «casting what is most intimate in us out into the universe» and that «these conditions occur only in the male», because woman is «natively concealing». That was what Lucía Sánchez Saornil was writing against.

Carmen Conde

When the obstacle stops being prejudice and becomes repression

After the Civil War, Carmen Conde was subjected to two summary proceedings, remained undocumented and had to confine herself for years in San Lorenzo de El Escorial. At times she concealed her name in order to work.

  1. Magdalena Noguera

    One of the heteronyms documented in her work.

  2. Florentina del Mar

    Used for short stories, children’s theatre, essays and translations.

  3. Asunción Parreño

    The third heteronym documented by studies of her activity during the post-war period.

The same woman who in 1979 became the first woman elected as a full member of the Real Academia Española had to alternate her own name with literary identities during the 1940s.

And as late as 1971, when Carmen Conde prepared her second anthology of women poets, she worked with Angelina Gatell, who could not sign it: she was under political sanction.

The consequence

Much of the recovery work has consisted of giving the names back

What the three cases share is how hard they are to reconstruct. Scattered names, works attributed to ghosts, authors who vanish from the handbooks because they are quite literally not signed where they should be.

When one of these writers is recovered today, half the research is not about interpreting the work. It is about proving whose work it is.

Further reading

Each of the three cases has its own monograph

The attributions given here come from the monographs devoted to each of the three. All are in Spanish:

  1. Establier Pérez, Helena (2000)

    Mujer y feminismo en la narrativa de Carmen de Burgos “Colombine”. Almería: Instituto de Estudios Almerienses.

  2. Ferris, José Luis (2007)

    Carmen Conde, vida, pasión y verso de una escritora olvidada. Barcelona: Temas de Hoy.

  3. Gómez Garrido, Marta (2011)

    La ambigüedad sexual en tres poetas de la modernidad: Lucía Sánchez Saornil, Ana María Martínez Sagi y Carmen Conde. MA dissertation supervised by María Dolores Romero López, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

  4. Neira, Julio (2020)

    “El ultraísmo y la mujer”, in El ultraísmo español y la vanguardia internacional. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.

Read next

Nine years and a photograph

From the Seville photograph, with no women in it, to the 1936 banquet.

Read the article

Interested in Spanish culture?

Our classes combine language and context, because understanding a text also means understanding where it comes from. Tell us what interests you and we will build the materials around it.